翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ The Astronomer (Vermeer)
・ The Astronomer's Dream
・ The Astronomical Journal
・ The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review
・ The Astronut Show
・ The Astrophysical Journal
・ The Astrosmurf
・ The AstroTwins
・ The Astrud Gilberto Album
・ The Astyanax
・ The Asura Analogues
・ The Asylum
・ The Asylum Choir
・ The Asylum for Wayward Victorian Girls
・ The Asylum Seeker
The Asymmetry (population ethics)
・ The Ataris
・ The Ataris discography
・ The Ataxian
・ The Atheism Tapes
・ The Atheist (comics)
・ The Atheist (play)
・ The Atheist Agenda
・ The Atheist Experience
・ The Atheist's Guide to Christmas
・ The Atheist's Tragedy
・ The Athenaeum (Acadia University)
・ The Athenaeum Hotel
・ The Athenian Mercury
・ The Athenian Murders


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

The Asymmetry (population ethics) : ウィキペディア英語版
The Asymmetry (population ethics)
The Asymmetry, also known as 'the Procreation Asymmetry,' is the idea in population ethics that there is a moral or evaluative asymmetry between bringing into existence individuals with good or bad lives. It was first discussed by Jan Narveson in 1967, and Jeff McMahan coined the term 'the Asymmetry' 1981.〔: “The Asymmetry was first discussed by Jan Narveson in 'Utilitarianism and New Generations', Mind 76 (1967), pp. 62–72. The label is due to Jeff McMahan, 'Problems of Population Theory', Ethics, 92 (1981), pp. 96-127.”〕 McMahan formulates the Asymmetry as follows: “while the fact that a person's life would be worse than no life at all ... constitutes a strong moral reason for not bringing him into existence, the fact that a person's life would be worth living provides no (or only a relatively weak) moral reason for bringing him into existence.”〔: “Consider the view that, while the fact that a person's life would be worse than no life at all (or 'worth not living') constitutes a strong moral reason for not bringing him into existence, the fact that a person's life would be worth living provides no (or only a relatively weak) moral reason for bringing him into existence. This view, which I shall refer to as 'the Asymmetry,' is approved both by Narveson and by common sense.”〕 Professor Nils Holtug formulates the Asymmetry evaluatively in terms of the value of outcomes instead of in terms of moral reasons. Holtug's formulation says that “while it detracts from the value of an outcome to add individuals whose lives are of overall negative value, it does not increase the value of an outcome to add individuals whose lives are of overall positive value.”
Much of the literature on the ethics of procreation deals with the Asymmetry.〔: “Much of the literature on the morality of procreation revolves around the issue whether there is a difference between the duty to bring a happy child into the world and the duty to avoid conceiving a miserable child.”〕 A number of authors have defended the Asymmetry,〔For example, , , , , , , , and .〕 and a number of authors have argued against it.〔For example, , , , , , and John Broome (according to ).〕
== See also ==

* Antifrustrationism
* Antinatalism
* Natalism
* Person-affecting view

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「The Asymmetry (population ethics)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.